Williams v. Florida

Williams v. Florida
Argued March 4, 1970
Decided June 22, 1970
Full case nameWilliams v. State of Florida
Citations399 U.S. 78 (more)
90 S. Ct. 1893; 26 L. Ed. 2d 446; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 98
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorWilliams v. State, 224 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); cert. granted, 396 U.S. 955 (1969).
Holding
(1) The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not excuse a criminal defendant from giving the prosecution notice of the identities of his alibi witnesses.
(2) The Sixth Amendment does not require that a jury must consist of 12 jurors.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Case opinions
MajorityWhite, joined by Burger, Brennan; Harlan, Stewart, Marshall (Part I); Black, Douglas (Part II)
ConcurrenceBurger
Concur/dissentBlack, joined by Douglas
Concur/dissentHarlan
Concur/dissentStewart
DissentMarshall (in part)
Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. V, VI, XIV

Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not entitle a defendant in a criminal trial to refuse to provide details of his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to have 12 members.[1]

  1. ^ Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search