Wolff v. McDonnell

Wolff v. McDonnell
Argued April 22, 1974
Decided June 26, 1974
Full case nameWolff, Warden, et al. v. McDonnell
Docket no.73-679
Citations418 U.S. 539 (more)
94 S. Ct. 2963; 41 L. Ed. 2d 935; 1974 U.S. LEXIS 91
Case history
PriorJudgment for plaintiffs in part, 342 F. Supp. 616 (D. Neb. 1972); aff'd in part, 483 F. 2d 1059 (8th Cir. 1973); cert. granted, 414 U.S. 1156 (1974).
Holding
In administrative proceedings regarding discipline, prisoners retain some of their due process rights.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
MajorityWhite, joined by Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
Concur/dissentMarshall, joined by Brennan
Concur/dissentDouglas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prisoners retained some due process rights when incarcerated. In particular, the Court ruled that due process required that prison disciplinary decisions to revoke good-time credits must be accompanied by notification of the inmate, administrative hearings, the chance to call witnesses and present evidence, and a written statement detailing the nature of the offense committed and the evidence for said offense.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search