Top-four primary

A top-four primary[1] or top-four ranked-choice voting[2] is an election method using a nonpartisan blanket primary where up to four candidates, those with the most votes, advance from a first round of FPTP voting, regardless of the political party. The round two (general) election, held some weeks later, uses instant-runoff voting (IRV, also known as ranked-choice voting, RCV) to confirm a winner among the top set of candidates.[3][4]

The Final-Four Voting system was first proposed by Katherine Gehl, an American business leader turned political innovator and philanthropist, and Michael Porter, professor at Harvard Business School, in a report they wrote for Harvard Business School in 2017. In “Why Competition in the Politics Industry is Failing America,” they made the case for an open, single-ballot top-four primary followed by an instant-runoff voting general election.[5]

Its first use was in 2022 Alaska's at-large congressional district special election. It can be seen as a replacement to the blanket primary which advances only the top-two candidates. It was first advocated by FairVote in 2012[6][7] with a statutory model proposed in 2015.[8]

A top-four primary can be seen as a variation of a two-round system where the second round (general election) is always held, even if a candidate gains a majority in the first (primary) round. A candidate receiving 20% of the primary vote is logically guaranteed to pass a top-four primary.[9]

One variation, called Final Five Voting, allows five candidates to pass the open primary.[10]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference afbe was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ "Missouri Top-Four Ranked Choice Voting Elections for Local, State, and Federal Officials Initiative (2022)".
  3. ^ "Top-four primary (ballotpedia.org)".
  4. ^ "OPINION: Voters in Florida and Alaska both did the right thing on open-primary initiatives". December 2020.
  5. ^ Gehl & Porter (September 2017). "Why Competition In The Politics Industry Is Failing America" (PDF). Harvard Business School. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  6. ^ Fixing Top Two in California The 2012 Elections and a Prescription for Further Reform
  7. ^ Top Four FairVote August 2013
  8. ^ "FAIRVOTE'S 2015 POLICY GUIDE: MODEL STATUTORY LANGUAGE".
  9. ^ Top Four Why Top Four Gives More Voice to Voters (FairVote)
  10. ^ "Final-Five Voting".

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search