Battle of Carillon

Battle of Carillon
Part of the French and Indian War

The Victory of Montcalm's Troops at Carillon by Henry Alexander Ogden. Montcalm (centre) and his troops celebrate their victory.
DateJuly 6–8, 1758
Location43°50′30″N 73°23′15″W / 43.84167°N 73.38750°W / 43.84167; -73.38750
Result French victory[1]
Belligerents

 France

 Great Britain

Commanders and leaders
Louis-Joseph de Montcalm
Chevalier de Levis
James Abercrombie
George Howe 
Strength
3,600 regulars, militia, & Indians 6,000 regulars
12,000 provincial troops, rangers, & Indians[2]
Casualties and losses
104 killed
273 wounded[3]
(battle on July 8)
1,000 killed
1,500 wounded[3]
(battle on July 8)

The Battle of Carillon, also known as the 1758 Battle of Ticonderoga,[4] was fought on July 8, 1758, during the French and Indian War (which was part of the global Seven Years' War). It was fought near Fort Carillon (now known as Fort Ticonderoga) on the shore of Lake Champlain in the frontier area between the British colony of New York and the French colony of New France.

In the battle, which took place primarily on a rise about three-quarters of a mile (one km) from the fort itself, a French army of about 3,600 men under General Marquis de Montcalm and the Chevalier de Levis defeated a numerically superior force of British troops under General James Abercrombie, which frontally assaulted an entrenched French position without using field artillery, a lack that left the British and their allies vulnerable and allowed the French to win a complete victory.[1] The battle was the bloodiest of the American theater of the war, with over 3,000 casualties suffered. French losses were about 400,[1] while more than 2,000 were British.[5]

American historian Lawrence Henry Gipson wrote of Abercrombie's campaign that "no military campaign was ever launched on American soil that involved a greater number of errors of judgment on the part of those in positions of responsibility".[6] Many military historians have cited the Battle of Carillon as a classic example of tactical military incompetence.[7] Abercrombie, confident of a quick victory, ignored several viable military options, such as flanking the French breastworks, waiting for his artillery, or laying siege to the fort. Instead, relying on a flawed report from a young military engineer, and ignoring some of that engineer's recommendations, he decided in favor of a direct frontal assault on the thoroughly entrenched French, without the benefit of artillery. Montcalm, while concerned about the weak military position of the fort, conducted the defense with spirit. However, due in part to a lack of time, he committed strategic errors in preparing the area's defenses that a competent attacker could have exploited, and he made tactical errors that made the attackers' job easier.[further explanation needed]

The fort, abandoned by its garrison, was captured by the British the following year, and it has been known as Fort Ticonderoga (after its location) ever since. This battle gave the fort a reputation for impregnability that had an effect on future military operations in the area. There were several large-scale military movements through the area in both the French and Indian War, as well as the American Revolutionary War with the American Capture of Fort Ticonderoga and the British siege of the fort two years later, however this was the only major battle fought near the fort's location.

  1. ^ a b c Grossman 2007, p. 229.
  2. ^ Chartrand 2000, p. 29
  3. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Chartrand88 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Chartrand 2000, p. 57
  5. ^ Nester (2008), p. 7
  6. ^ Gipson, p. 232
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference Nester162_4Fault was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search