| Moody v. NetChoice, LLC NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 26, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al., v. NetChoice, LLC dba NetChoice, et al. NetChoice, LLC dba NetChoice, et al., v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, et al. |
| Docket nos. | 22-277 22-555 |
| Questions presented | |
| 1. Whether the laws’ content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment. 2. Whether the laws’ individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton are pending United States Supreme Court cases related to protected speech under the First Amendment, content moderation by interactive service providers on the Internet under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and two state statutes passed in Florida and Texas that sought to limit this moderation. While originating with statutes in two different states, the Moody and Paxton cases are often discussed in tandem because the U.S. Supreme Court is likely to review them together.[1]
- ^ McCabe, David (25 February 2024). "What to Know About the Supreme Court Arguments on Social Media Laws". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search