Numerosity adaptation effect

Two figures, one above the other. First figure (up) display contain two circles: 10 dots in the circle at left and 100 dots in the circle at right. Fixation mark is placed between two circles. The second figure display contain two circles with each of them contain 40 dots. The dots in the left circle are arranged as mirror image of the dots in the right circle — An example of the numerosity adaptation effect

The numerosity adaptation effect is a perceptual phenomenon in numerical cognition which demonstrates non-symbolic numerical intuition and exemplifies how numerical percepts can impose themselves upon the human brain automatically. This effect was first described in 2008.^[1]^[2]

Presently, this effect is described only for controlled experimental conditions. In the illustration, a viewer should have a strong impression that the left display (lower figure) is more numerous than the right, after 30 seconds of viewing the adaptation (upper figure), although both have exactly the same number of dots. The viewer might also underestimate the number of dots presented in the display.^[1]

Both effects are resistant to manipulation of the non-numerical parameters of the display. Thus, this effect cannot be simply explained in terms of size, density, or contrast.^[3]^[4]

Perhaps the most astonishing aspect of these effects is that they happen immediately, and without conscious control (i.e., knowing that the numbers are equal would not hamper their happening).^[1] This points to the operation of a special and largely automatic processing system. As noted by Burr & Ross (2008):

Just as we have a direct visual sense of the reddishness of half a dozen ripe cherries, so we do of their sixishness.^[2]

^ ^a ^b ^c Dehaene, Stanislas (2009). "Origins of Mathematical Intuitions The Case of Arithmetic". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1156: 232–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x. PMID 19338511. S2CID 2382715.
^ ^a ^b Burr, David; John Ross (2008). "A Visual Sense of Number". Current Biology. 18 (6): 425–428. Bibcode:2008CBio...18..425B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052. PMID 18342507.
^ Izard, Véronique; Stanislas Dehaene (2008). "Calibrating the mental number line" (PDF). Cognition. 106 (3): 1221–1247. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.148.2960. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004. PMID 17678639. S2CID 9488163. Retrieved 2010-04-01.
^ Cite error: The named reference Burr&Ross2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Dehaene-1] Dehaene, Stanislas (2009). "Origins of Mathematical Intuitions The Case of Arithmetic". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1156: 232–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x. PMID 19338511. S2CID 2382715.

[Burr&Ross-2] Burr, David; John Ross (2008). "A Visual Sense of Number". Current Biology. 18 (6): 425–428. Bibcode:2008CBio...18..425B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052. PMID 18342507.

[3] Izard, Véronique; Stanislas Dehaene (2008). "Calibrating the mental number line" (PDF). Cognition. 106 (3): 1221–1247. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.148.2960. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004. PMID 17678639. S2CID 9488163. Retrieved 2010-04-01.

[Burr&Ross2-4] Cite error: The named reference Burr&Ross2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]