Back IHRA-Arbeitsdefinition von Antisemitismus German IHRA-definitie Dutch Definições de antissemitismo Portuguese 反猶太主義的現行定義 Chinese
| Part of a series on |
| Antisemitism |
|---|
 |
 Category |
The working definition of antisemitism, also called the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism or IHRA definition, is a non-legally binding statement on what antisemitism is, that reads: "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities."[1] Accompanying the working definition, but of disputed status, are 11 illustrative examples whose purpose is described as guiding the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) in its work, seven of which relate to criticism of the Israeli government. As such, pro-Israeli organizations have been advocates for the worldwide legal adoption of the definition.[2]
The definition was developed during 2003–04 and first published on 28 January 2005 on the website of the European Union agency, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC).[3][4] The publication was made "without formal review",[5] and remained a working draft,[6] until November 2013 when the EUMC's successor agency, the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), removed it from its website in "a clear-out of non-official documents".[5][7][8]
The working definition was adopted by the IHRA Plenary (consisting of representatives from 31 countries) in Bucharest, Romania, on 26 May 2016. It was subsequently accepted by the European Parliament and other national and international bodies and employed for internal use by a number of governmental and political institutions. However, many such adoptions have either not referenced or excluded the examples, given the ongoing controversy. The controversy led to the creation of the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism and the Nexus Document, both of which expressly draw distinctions between antisemitism and criticism of Israel.[2]
The IHRA definition has been heavily criticised by academics, including legal scholars, who say that it stifles free speech relating to criticism of Israeli actions and policies. High-profile controversies took place in the United Kingdom in 2011 within the University and College Union,[note 1] and within the Labour Party in 2018. The definition has been contested for weaknesses that critics say lend themselves to abuse,[10][11][note 2] for obstructing campaigning for the rights of Palestinians, and for being too vague. Kenneth S. Stern, one of the original drafters, has opposed the weaponization of the definition on college campuses in ways that might suppress and limit free speech.[13][14] The Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism was created partly in response to these objections.
- ^ Ullrich 2019, p. 6.
- ^ a b Penslar, Derek (14 April 2022). "Who's Afraid of Defining Antisemitism?". Antisemitism Studies. 6 (1). Indiana University Press: 133–145. ISSN 2474-1817. Retrieved 27 May 2023.
Advocates of the IHRA definition are vigorously supportive of Israel and link anti-Zionism with antisemitism even though the definition itself does not explicitly say as much… Over the past couple of years, dissatisfaction with the IHRA definition both on its own terms and with how it has been deployed in the public sphere led two separate groups of people to develop what became the ND and JDA.
- ^ Stern 2010.
- ^ Lerman 2018b.
- ^ a b Marcus 2015, pp. 166–167.
- ^ Great Britain. Department for Communities and Local Government. All-party inquiry into antisemitism: government response, The Stationery Office, 2007, p. 3. Archived 17 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
JTAwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Wiesenthalwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Marcus 2015, pp. 21–22.
- ^ Friedman 2021, pp. 1–49.
- ^ Gould 2020, p. 825.
- ^ Ullrich 2019, pp. 1–21, 3, 16.
- ^ Stern 2019.
- ^ 'What started as an honest attempt to tackle growing antisemitism quickly became weaponized by definitional warriors, among them the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), the American Jewish Committee (AJC), and the Brandeis Center, all of whom have lobbied institutions and governments to adopt it.'(Brown & Nerenberg 2023)
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search